| This
information has been taken directly from the Accelerate
U - Standards and Resource Guides (with approval) from the K-12
Education, NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT site. No information
in this document has been changed.
Standard 3: Responding
to and Analyzing Works of Art
3. Students will reflect on, interpret, and
evaluate works of art, using the language of art criticism. Students
will analyze the visual characteristics of the natural and built
environment and explain the social, cultural, psychological, and
environmental dimensions of the visual arts. Students will compare
the ways in which a variety of ideas, themes, and concepts are expressed
through the visual arts with the ways they are expressed in other
disciplines.
Students:
- discuss and write their analyses and interpretations
of their own works of art and the art of others, using appropriate
critical language (a)
- identify, analyze, and interpret the visual
and sensory characteristics that they discover in natural and
human-made forms (b)
- compare the ways ideas and concepts are
communicated through visual art with the various ways that those
ideas and concepts are manifested in other art forms (c).
- compare the ways ideas, themes, and concepts
are communicated through the visual arts in other disciplines,
and the various ways that those ideas, themes, and concepts are
manifested within the discipline (d).
This is evident, for example, when students:
- write an interpretation of Horace Pippin's
Domino Players after class analysis of the images and composition
- discuss the way in which the black and white
and gray of the painting enhances the meaning of Picasso's Guerinca
analyze the engineering skills and the political
skills, in addition to his artistic vision that the artist, Christo,
needed in order to complete the Wrapping Of The Reich Stag
in 1995.
|