English Language Arts | Fine Arts | Foreign Language | Health | Math | Phys Ed | Science | Social Studies | Technology | Advanced Learner

This information has been taken directly from the Accelerate U - Standards and Resource Guides (with approval) from the K-12 Education,  NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT site. No information in this document has been changed.

Learning Standards for Mathematics, Science, and Technology at Three Levels

Standard 1: Intermediate
Students will use mathematical analysis, scientific inquiry, and engineering design, as appropriate, to pose questions, seek answers, and develop solutions.

Scientific Inquiry

1. The central purpose of scientific inquiry is to develop explanations of natural phenomena in a continuing, creative process.

Students:

  • formulate questions independently with the aid of references appropriate for guiding the search for explanations of everyday observations.
  • construct explanations independently for natural phenomena, especially by proposing preliminary visual models of phenomena.
  • represent, present, and defend their proposed explanations of everyday observations so that they can be understood and assessed by others.
  • seek to clarify, to assess critically, and to reconcile with their own thinking the ideas presented by others, including peers, teachers, authors, and scientists.
This is evident, for example, when students:
  • After being shown the disparity between the amount of solid waste which is recycled and which could be recycled, students working in small groups are asked to explain why this disparity exists. They develop a set of possible explanations and to select one for intensive study. After their explanation is critiqued by other groups, it is refined and submitted for assessment. The explanation is rated on clarity, plausibility, and appropriateness for intensive study using research methods.
     
 2. Beyond the use of reasoning and consensus, scientific inquiry involves the testing of proposed explanations involving the use of conventional techniques and procedures and usually requiring considerable ingenuity.

Students:

  • use conventional techniques and those of their own design to make further observations and refine their explanations, guided by a need for more information.
  • develop, present, and defend formal research proposals for testing their own explanations of common phenomena, including ways of obtaining needed observations and ways of conducting simple controlled experiments.
  • carry out their research proposals, recording observations and measurements (e.g., lab  notes, audio tape, computer disk, video tape) to help assess the explanation.
This is evident, for example, when students:
  • develop a research plan for studying the accuracy of their explanation of the disparity between the amount of solid waste that is recycled and that could be recycled.* After their tentative plan is critiqued, they refine it and submit it for assessment. The research proposal is rated on clarity, feasibility and soundness as a method of studying the explanations' accuracy. They carry out the plan, with teacher suggested modifications. This work is rated by the teacher while it is in progress.
 3. The observations made while testing proposed explanations, when analyzed using conventional
    and invented methods, provide new insights into phenomena.

    Students:

         design charts, tables, graphs and other representations of observations in conventional and
         creative ways to help them address their research question or hypothesis.
         interpret the organized data to answer the research question or hypothesis and to gain
         insight into the problem.
         modify their personal understanding of phenomena based on evaluation of their hypothesis.

    This is evident, for example, when students:

         carry out their plan making appropriate observations and measurements. They analyze the
         data, reach conclusions regarding their explanation of the disparity between the amount of
         solid waste which is recycled and which could be recycled., and prepare a tentative report
         which is critiqued by other groups, refined, and submitted for assessment. The report is
         rated on clarity, quality of presentation of data and analyses, and soundness of
         conclusions.


©2008 Byram Hills Central School District
Armonk, NY
Contact Webmasters